 |
Calling Customers that are not Seriously Delinquent
Questions from our Readers
By Michael
C. Dennis, MBA, CBF
Question.
Our collection department does a good job with the balances over 30 days past
due, but cannot seem to achieve the collection goals for balances 1 to 30
days past due. I think it is fair to say the collection staff is uncomfortable
confronting customers that are not seriously delinquent. Any suggestions?
Answer.
I think there is a widely held belief that it is inappropriate to
call customers until they become seriously delinquent. I think it
is a central part of the problem you described. In my opinion, collection
calls should be made without delay as soon as an account becomes
delinquent. Many companies establish a grace period before any collection
calls are made. I believe this is an invitation for customers to
delay payments, and for this reason I can think of no advantage to
the seller of allowing a grace period before starting the collection
process.
I suggest that you teach your collection staff to start the collection
discussion by requesting/demanding immediate payment in full of the
entire past due balance... not just the balance that is over 30 days
past due. Please also consider the following suggestions:
-
Set specific and measurable goals for yourself and your subordinates
in the 1 to 30 past due column.
-
Hold subordinates accountable for not reaching these targets.
This would include disciplinary action for poor performance if
the necessary improvements in collections are not made within a
reasonable [but specific and relatively narrow] time frame.
-
Consider holding orders for customers 1 to 30 slow --- at least
until they are contacted and make a reasonable and specific payment
commitment.
-
Be certain collectors follow up promptly and systematically on
broken payment commitments.
-
Help to shorten the collection cycle by faxing rather than mailing
any requested supporting documents - even when there are a large
number of documents to send.
|
 |
|
 |
 |