 |
When a company changes its outside [independent] auditors, this is
a red flag to trade creditors. It is important for the credit manager
to try to find out why this happened. The credit manager will often
be told that cost savings was the motive. Even this benign reason is
not without a certain amount of risk. What risk? The risk that changing
auditors to save money might lead to lower quality work or a less comprehensive
Changing CPA firms can be [and often is] prompted by disagreements between the
previous CPA firm and company management regarding certain disputed accounting
issues. As a creditor, you should carefully compare the opinion letter issued
by the new CPA firm to be sure that it is issued without qualifications. Also,
read the notes carefully to determine what if any accounting changes have been
made in preparing the new financial statements.
One final thought: A decision to change auditors does not necessarily
mean that there is a problem between the CPA firm and its client. There
are a variety of legitimate reasons for a company to change CPA firms
unrelated to disputes or cost savings. For example, the company may
want to hire the consulting division of the CPA firm and having one
auditing firm analyzing financial reports and another making recommendations
might be counterproductive. Another example would be the CPA firm of
Arthur Anderson. Many of their clients feels that the issues surrounding
the Enron Corporation bankruptcy including allegations of shredding
documents is enough reason to change CPA firms. |
 |
|
 |
 |